Websites in the Cloud
Self-Hosted Websites: Netlify, Vercel, and Alternatives — Comparison, Features, and Recommendations
Introduction
Self-hosting refers to the process of deploying web projects on cloud platforms without the need to configure and maintain a dedicated server infrastructure. This approach allows for automation of build, testing, and deployment processes, provides high fault tolerance, CDN support, and integration with serverless architecture.
This article presents an analytical overview of popular self-hosting platforms — Netlify and Vercel. It includes a comparative analysis based on key parameters, alternative solutions, and recommendations for selecting the most appropriate service depending on the type of project and operational requirements.
Definition and Key Characteristics of Self-Hosting
Self-hosting involves using cloud services that provide ready-made infrastructure for launching web applications. These platforms offer:
Integration with version control systems (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket).
Automated project building.
CI/CD pipeline support.
Hosting of static content.
Support for serverless functions.
Global content delivery via CDN.
This approach is particularly relevant for frontend developers, startups, and small-scale projects where speed of deployment, ease of management, and scalability are critical.
Netlify: Overview of Capabilities
General Information
Netlify is one of the first platforms to popularize the JAMstack concept. It is designed for hosting static websites and applications, with extended capabilities provided by serverless functions and other tools.
Key Features
Integration with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket.
Automatic deployment upon repository push.
Deployment previews.
Serverless functions (Lambda-like).
Global CDN.
Form handling with spam protection.
Free plan with limitations on traffic and build time.
Limitations
Restrictions on free-tier build time and function call limits.
Limited support for SSR and complex backend implementations.
Less flexible caching system compared to competitors.
Vercel: Overview of Capabilities
General Information
Originally developed as a platform for Next.js applications, Vercel has evolved into a universal solution for hosting JavaScript- and TypeScript-based projects, including React, Vue, and Svelte.
Key Features
Full support for SSR and SSG via Next.js.
Edge Network — global content delivery with minimal latency.
Edge Functions — lightweight serverless functions.
Instant Preview — immediate preview of changes after commit.
Integration with modern development tools such as Turborepo and Nx.
Free plan with limitations on build time and request volume.
Limitations
Steeper learning curve for users not using Next.js.
Additional costs when using advanced SSR and Edge Function features.
Limited form-handling functionality compared to Netlify.
Comparative Analysis: Netlify vs Vercel
Framework Support
All JS frameworks
Next.js (first-class)
SSR / SSG
Limited SSR support
Full SSR and SSG support
Serverless Functions
Yes
Yes (Edge Functions)
CDN
Global
Edge Network
Git Integration
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket
Forms
Full support
Limited support
Free Plan
Available
Available
Build Configuration File
netlify.toml
vercel.json
Best For
Static sites
Next.js projects
Pricing and Plans
Netlify
Free Plan: 300 build minutes/month, 100 function calls/day, 100 GB traffic.
Pro Plan: From $19/month — increased limits, team access, analytics.
Enterprise: Custom plans and configurations.
Vercel
Free Plan: 3,000 edge function executions/day, 1 TB traffic, 100 build minutes.
Pro Plan: From $20/month — more builds, private deployments, custom domain.
Enterprise: Custom plans and configurations.
Performance and SEO Impact
Lighthouse Score
High
Very High
Core Web Vitals
Good
Excellent
CDN
Fastly
Edge Network
Redirects
Supported
Supported
URL Rewriting
Available
Available
Vercel demonstrates superior performance due to its Edge Network, which positively impacts SEO metrics.
Security
Private Deployments
Yes (Pro)
Yes (Pro)
Secret Management
Available
Available
Access Audit
Available
Available
SSL Support
Auto
Auto
Collaboration and Access Control
Both platforms support team collaboration:
User roles (admin, editor, guest).
Integration with Slack and Microsoft Teams.
Access management at the project and team levels.
Third-Party Integrations
Headless CMS
Gatsby, Sanity, Tina
Contentful, Sanity
Analytics
Google Analytics
Vercel Analytics
Monetization
Stripe
Stripe
CI/CD
Netlify Build
Vercel CLI
Technology-Specific Recommendations
Next.js
Vercel
Nuxt.js
Netlify or Vercel
Vue + Vite
Netlify or Vercel
React + SSR
Vercel
Gatsby
Netlify
SvelteKit
Netlify or Vercel
Migration Between Platforms
From Netlify to Vercel:
Export environment variables.
Create a
vercel.json
file instead ofnetlify.toml
.Replace AWS Lambda functions with Edge Functions.
Use Vercel CLI for deployment.
From Vercel to Netlify:
Replace
vercel.json
withnetlify.toml
.Rewrite Edge Functions to AWS Lambda format.
Reconfigure forms and domains.
Alternative Platforms
1. Render
Supports Node.js, Python, Ruby, Java.
Full-stack application hosting.
More powerful free tier than competitors.
2. Cloudflare Pages
Integration with Workers and Durable Objects.
Excellent performance.
Supports only static content and simple functions.
3. Firebase Hosting (Google)
Ideal for Firebase backend integration.
Suitable for SPAs and PWAs.
Well-documented.
4. GitHub Pages
Free static site hosting from GitHub.
No CI/CD or advanced features.
Checklist for Choosing a Platform
Is SSR required? Are you using Next.js? Is form handling important? Do you need full-stack hosting? Is there a budget for a paid plan? Are preview deployments and CMS integrations essential?
Conclusion
Netlify and Vercel are two of the most widely used and feature-rich platforms for self-hosting web projects.
Netlify is recommended for static content-based projects requiring form support and minimal complexity.
Vercel is the preferred choice for Next.js-based applications that require SSR, SSG, and optimized global content delivery via Edge Network.
For tasks that exceed the standard capabilities of these platforms, alternative solutions such as Render, Cloudflare Pages, or Firebase Hosting should be considered.
The selection of a hosting platform should be based on an analysis of the project's technological specifics, expected traffic volume, performance requirements, and available budget.
Last updated
Was this helpful?